![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | iTrader | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#106 | |
|
Resident Dentist
|
Re: November 2009 - MCC - Discussion Thread
Quote:
Also, bushido is not a blue mechanic - it has been on exactly 1 blue card, and that card is in an Un set. So no go there. The second ability is also a pump ability - something blue never does. If I was designing this card, I would probably make it white. Plural of octopus is octopuses. Octopi is also acceptable.
__________________
'94 - '97, '05 - '07 I think I'm done buying new cards. At least MWS is free... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#107 |
|
Apprentice
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 10
|
Re: November 2009 - MCC - Discussion Thread
This is entirely true, but that might be a common mistake. I'd consider a reminder text (Permanants may only activate one loyalty ability per turn) It's perfectly fine without it, but just a thought.
__________________
Check out my blog |
|
|
|
|
|
#108 | |
|
Conjurer
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Winter Park, FL
Posts: 374
|
Re: November 2009 - MCC - Discussion Thread
Quote:
It's a lot of text though, and the card is already framed pretty tightly. The thing about reminder text is that it spells out things players should already know. Rares routinely omit reminder text if text box space needs to be conserved. It's assumed that players casting Greater Gargadon already know what "Suspend 10- " means. For that matter, it's assumed that players casting Chandra Nalaar already know how planeswalker abilities work. After all, planeswalkers don't have any reminder text whatsoever.
Last edited by JakeKessler; 11-06-2009 at 05:37 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#109 | |
|
Vortex Dragoon
|
Re: November 2009 - MCC - Discussion Thread
@Thomasdm - Would you rather have your card say OTHER cat/soldier creatures you control? or would you also prefer him to get +1/+1 first strike and can block an additional creature?
__________________
![]() Quotable Quotes: Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#110 |
|
Mage
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 119
|
Re: November 2009 - MCC - Discussion Thread
Mine:
Spoiler:
...as written in the submission, the tribal choice is not perfect...but it slides somewhere between the game and the real world, considering that, after all, all the players of magic are human (obvious) and wizards (as player of magic, obvious again) . |
|
|
|
|
|
#112 |
|
God of the Vortex
|
Re: November 2009 - MCC - Discussion Thread
I'm loving this design challenge. Made some more. Will post them here so my submission post isn't so crowded.
Estabar Oaktree 3GG Legendary Creature- Squirrel Druid Squirrels you control gain +1/+1. XX, T: Put X 1/1 green squirrel tokens into play. "The first sentient squirrel learned to call upon his brethren." Draw of the Earth 2RG Tribal Enchantment- Shaman Druid Forests and green permanents you control gain "T: Add G to your mana pool." Mountains and red permanents you control gain "Sacrifice this permanent: Add RR to your mana pool." "Nature's fury and nature's calm are two sides of the same coin." Druid Elemental GG Creature- Druid Elemental ~'s power is equal to the total power of lands you control and it's toughness is equal to the total toughness of lands you control. */* "He took one with nature to the extreme." Censor Being 3BB Creature- Nightmare Horror Intimidate Whenever ~ deals combat damage to a player, search that player's library for a card and exile it. Then shuffle that player's library. Whenever ~ leaves the battlefield, shuffle all cards exiled with ~ into their owner's library. 3/3 Eye of the Greenskin God 4 Tribal Artifact- Dragon Goblin R: target creature gains +1/+0 until end of turn. Sacrifice a creature: ~ deals damage to target creature equal to the sacrificed creature's toughness.
__________________
Ah, women. They make the highs higher and the lows more frequent.-Friedrich Nietzsche ![]() Banner ala Lymons "I had a sammich in my head!" -Gir THIS SPACE LEFT BLANK ACCIDENTALLY! My Points and Cookies (Saving up for the trip to Rio. Gotta get it by the time the Olympics get there...)
Spoiler:
If you want to post in any thread where new cards are revealed, please read this:
Spoiler:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#113 | |
|
Patient Apprentice
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 32
|
Re: November 2009 - MCC - Discussion Thread
Quote:
here is a few: One with Fire One with Passion Chief of Inspiration One with Eagle Heart Wrath of the Thunder Gods as a joke.... He of many tokens :-P
__________________
Currently using: ![]() ![]() Storm Deck![]() Golgari Death Pact Knights of the Pride Unstable DanDan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#114 |
|
Experienced Apprentice
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 84
|
Re: November 2009 - MCC - Discussion Thread
I've edited my submission again, what do you think?
Spoiler:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#115 | |
|
Conjurer
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Winter Park, FL
Posts: 374
|
Re: November 2009 - MCC - Discussion Thread
Quote:
2. Flavor text seems off. If it's eating itself, shouldn't I see it shrinking? 3. Way overpowered. I get to kill something of my choice every time it attacks, and I get (possible two) counters to boot? For five mana? Yeesh. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#116 |
|
Experienced Apprentice
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 84
|
Re: November 2009 - MCC - Discussion Thread
@Jake: Well, thanks for the suggestions, but I still can't find a way to fix the "eating ability," I want it can eat either opponents' creatures or mine if the only player that controlling creatures is me (that could including itself) but I don't want to destroy at random or sacrifice effect, since it's weird if it can eat Darkstell Colossus though
Last edited by ALEX Ryugami; 11-07-2009 at 04:33 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#117 | ||
|
Vortex Dragoon
|
Re: November 2009 - MCC - Discussion Thread
Quote:
__________________
![]() Quotable Quotes: Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#118 |
|
Experienced Apprentice
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 84
|
Re: November 2009 - MCC - Discussion Thread
@KlassyReborn: Oops, I just mistyped my last post, it should be "I want it can eat either opponents' creatures or mine if the only player that controlling creatures is me (that could including itself)"
I'll edit the post |
|
|
|
|
|
#119 |
|
Mage
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 104
|
Re: November 2009 - MCC - Discussion Thread
i'm going with the RG one. What do you think?
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#120 | ||
|
Mage
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 119
|
Re: November 2009 - MCC - Discussion Thread
Quote:
Have the destroy/sacrifice as an upkeep cost would make it less original. Quote:
@xaer0knight: ^ - ^...!! @Sucros: ...i like it a lot. |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|